Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2023 17:57:29 GMT
Jan 14, 2023 17:36:35 GMT @ling said:
Jan 14, 2023 17:21:09 GMT @ajay said:
@ling well considering everything that's been discussed I'm still favouring brown bear over E. badger for grappling mechanics specifically. The evidence you produced on E. badgers injurying one another I think comes down mainly to having a better bite and finishing ability than we thought rather than grappling mechanics.But is E. badger overall a better grappler than clouded leopard? Well according to humerus-to-radius ML ratios clouded leopard definitely has considerably superior grappling mechanics relative to overall front limb robusticity/strength.
E. badger ML%s: 10.04 humerus and 8.03 radius.
Clouded leopard: 9.01 humerus and 10.57 radius.
But the E. badger has a moderately more robust humerus, possibly indicating a greater overall strength of the front limbs. This does go a certain way towards evening out the grappling score.
I mean some weak-arse gracile cats have superior grappling mechanics to E. badger, while the gracile cat still won't come anywhere close to outgrappling the badger due to the total robusticity figures of the badger being way too great.
For example the Eurasian lynx has humerus ML% of 6.67 and radius of 6.07, versus 10.04 and 8.03 respectively for E. badger. In other words the E. lynx has moderately superior grappling mechanics to the badger.
HOWEVER even though the badger has inferior grappling mechanics to the lynx the badger will still easily outgrapple the lynx on account of being overall far more robust/strong.
I'm just looking at the robusticity table I linked in a post above (it's making it so much easier to assess ML percentages and determine patterns now that all ML%s are pre-calculated against their common names). What I'm noticing is the ML radius %s of gracile cats are generally less than their ML humerus %s, while in robust cats the ML radius %s are generally greater.
This indicates that not only are robust cats, well, overall stronger and more robust, but that even relative to overall robusticity robust cats tend to have decently superior grappling mechanics than gracile cats.
Based on humerus-to-radius ML% ratios clouded leopard even stands out for grappling mechanics among most robust cats. Lion stands out equally so with CL, with only jaguar standing out moreso.
My conclusion I guess is that E. badger may or may not be superior grappler to CL. It's probably close. CL is the superior finisher, although the badger is not a poor finisher, a better finisher than we originally thought.
With the CL possibly holding its own in the grapple, combined with its superior grappling mechanics, I think the CL is now is a better position than I thought in gaining a finishing position and complete a kill on the badger.
Hm, I'm thinking of changing my vote to CL now. If you think this decision is in error, can you tell me what part of my reasoning(s) is flawed?
I'm starting to question my size comparison. I made the badger 44i long WITHOUT the tail, instead of with the tail, meaning it should be 35i long if I'm not using the tail, BUT when I compare it to the CL the badger looks weigh less than 5kg smaller. Maybe the photo of the badger I used wasn't from one in Autumn, but it's impossible to tell. The length of the 27kg badger (record-sized) isn't listed anywhere either.