Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2022 21:02:20 GMT
Your bs is getting boring. You seem to be making up too much stuff on the spot. I respect the bans since the countries don't care about hurting pit mommy feelings. If it makes you feel any better, all pitbull type dogs need a ban. Your cluelessness and lack of knowledge is getting boring you don’t even know what a real American Pitbull Terrier is, you’ve probably never even seen one in your life like I said before, don’t speak on breeds you know nothing about Random dog bites someone? Know one cares. “Pitbull looking” bites someone? It’s on the news While Johnson’s arguments were complete dogshit, yours are not any more better. You say you have “knowledge” but have of the shit you say is the exact same a pibble momma would say trying to explain why Pitbulls are not dangerous. “Oh, Huskies, Labs, Chihuahuas attack more!” “Any dog can attack!” “Dog attacks on humans are extremely rare.” The only argument that was correct in this is the misidentification. American Bullies are NOT Pitbulls. |
|
|
|
Post by lincoln on Dec 5, 2022 21:11:53 GMT
Your cluelessness and lack of knowledge is getting boring you don’t even know what a real American Pitbull Terrier is, you’ve probably never even seen one in your life like I said before, don’t speak on breeds you know nothing about Random dog bites someone? Know one cares. “Pitbull looking” bites someone? It’s on the news While Johnson’s arguments were complete dogshit, yours are not any more better. You say you have “knowledge” but have of the shit you say is the exact same a pibble momma would say trying to explain why Pitbulls are not dangerous. “Oh, Huskies, Labs, Chihuahuas attack more!” “Any dog can attack!” “Dog attacks on humans are extremely rare.” The only argument that was correct in this is the misidentification. American Bullies are NOT Pitbulls. Those stories I spoke of where only a side fact, which is why i didn’t mention them in the beginning. I am by no means like a dog momma. you are bending and twisting what I say. I don’t claim that any breed attacks more, I’m simply saying if its not a dog people see as dangerous then no one cares. Most of those I didn’t even say. Im Simply saying that misidentification is the reason why “Pitbull” attacks are so high and most people don’t know what a real A.P.B.T is. Misidentification is mostly all I’ve even talked about in this argument Dog attacks are rare BTW I suggest reading what the person said before commenting on it, either you didn’t read it or you misunderstood it |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2022 21:14:11 GMT
Your cluelessness and lack of knowledge is getting boring you don’t even know what a real American Pitbull Terrier is, you’ve probably never even seen one in your life like I said before, don’t speak on breeds you know nothing about Random dog bites someone? Know one cares. “Pitbull looking” bites someone? It’s on the news While Johnson’s arguments were complete dogshit, yours are not any more better. You say you have “knowledge” but have of the shit you say is the exact same a pibble momma would say trying to explain why Pitbulls are not dangerous. “Oh, Huskies, Labs, Chihuahuas attack more!” “Any dog can attack!” “Dog attacks on humans are extremely rare.” The only argument that was correct in this is the misidentification. American Bullies are NOT Pitbulls. Dog attacks on humans being rare is pretty valid, 50 deaths a year and 365 million people... what the hell is the problem? Where is it? It's a dog. 50 people are irrelevant. |
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Dec 5, 2022 21:43:48 GMT
Your cluelessness and lack of knowledge is getting boring you don’t even know what a real American Pitbull Terrier is, you’ve probably never even seen one in your life like I said before, don’t speak on breeds you know nothing about Random dog bites someone? Know one cares. “Pitbull looking” bites someone? It’s on the news While Johnson’s arguments were complete dogshit, yours are not any more better. You say you have “knowledge” but have of the shit you say is the exact same a pibble momma would say trying to explain why Pitbulls are not dangerous. “Oh, Huskies, Labs, Chihuahuas attack more!” “Any dog can attack!” “Dog attacks on humans are extremely rare.” The only argument that was correct in this is the misidentification. American Bullies are NOT Pitbulls. I think the "not a real pitbull" argument is the weakest one, like we get what they mean by "pitbull", just because it's not an adba registered gamebred pure apbt is like nitpicking to avoid the fact that "pitbull-esque" dogs DO actually over-represent in the recorded dog attack statistics and especially in the recorded fatalities by dog attack. That's a reasonable point, but you have to focus in on that little excerpt of data with tunnel vision to be tricked into believing there is a problem. By far the most noteworthy statistic is how incredibly rare dog attacks and fatalities by dog attack are, compared to just about any other way someone can be injured or killed. It's actually remarkable how much dogs in general, including pitbulls (real or otherwise) bite their lip and refrain from harming people. It's otherworldly restraint. One that humans of any race or gender can't come close to matching. If dogs were a race they'd be by far the most peaceful race in regards to their violence towards humans, even pitbulls. It's weirdly low and they are actively not-biting people with extreme vigilance, even perhaps when they should. When you look up cases of pitbulls being abused by people, it's a nonstop barrage of violence and cruelty all day every day. Even these pitbulls are holding back from attacking most of the time while they get lit on fire or have acid thrown on them or have their muzzle tapes shut or their eyes glued shut or their legs broken or get hung or electrocuted or get put in a sack with rocks and drowned and etc etc. The most noteworthy thing about pitbull attacks is how much they don't do them. You can only pick on pitbulls by zeroing in on comparing them other breeds of dog, who are all also weirdly refraining from attacking people (not so weird, as they did evolve to not attack humans in the first place) and even that is a statistic skewed by the heightened rate of poor-ownership practices they endure and the heightened abuse and neglect by the worst kinds of people, and also that data is skewed by the fact they are incidentally good at attacking, so when they very very very rarely do, it's a big deal. But that last point should not be held against them any more than we should lock up George Foreman on the grounds he can punch hard. |
|
|
|
Post by Johnson on Dec 5, 2022 23:58:40 GMT
While Johnson’s arguments were complete dogshit, yours are not any more better. You say you have “knowledge” but have of the shit you say is the exact same a pibble momma would say trying to explain why Pitbulls are not dangerous. “Oh, Huskies, Labs, Chihuahuas attack more!” “Any dog can attack!” “Dog attacks on humans are extremely rare.” The only argument that was correct in this is the misidentification. American Bullies are NOT Pitbulls. Those stories I spoke of where only a side fact, which is why i didn’t mention them in the beginning. I am by no means like a dog momma. you are bending and twisting what I say. I don’t claim that any breed attacks more, I’m simply saying if its not a dog people see as dangerous then no one cares. Most of those I didn’t even say. Im Simply saying that misidentification is the reason why “Pitbull” attacks are so high and most people don’t know what a real A.P.B.T is. Misidentification is mostly all I’ve even talked about in this argument Dog attacks are rare BTW I suggest reading what the person said before commenting on it, either you didn’t read it or you misunderstood it Um no. Most dog attacks cause no injuries or very mild ones. Pitbulls, including the APBT, on the other hand... Bites from pit bull terriers were more severe than those of other dogs, with a mean DBCI of 3.2 compared to 2.3. Bites from pit bull terriers had a significantly higher rate of consultation when compared to other breeds, receiving specialty care in 94% of the cases and in 50% of the cases, respectively. Injuries from pit bull terrier bites were significantly more likely to require surgical repair and had five times the rate of operative repair when compared to other breeds. -Dog bites of the head and neck: an evaluation of a common pediatric trauma and associated treatment (2014) " Attacks by pit bulls are associated with higher morbidity rates, higher hospital charges, and a higher risk of death than are attacks by other breeds of dogs. Strict regulation of pit bulls may substantially reduce the US mortality rates related to dog bites." - Mortality, mauling, and maiming by vicious dogs. (2011) Most reviews have suggested that large dogs, such as American Pit Bull Terriers, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds are the main species involved in this type of trauma.16–18 Wolff19 and Morgan et al.20 claimed that American Pit Bull Terriers and German Shepherds are responsible for the majority of fatal attacks. In a retrospective study of 20 maxillofacial canine bite cases, 45% of attacks were made by Pit Bull Terriers. This may be explained by the increasing use of this breed as guard dogs for their aggressiveness and physical imposition.8 These data are in agreement with our findings that most facial fractures were caused by American Pit Bull Terrier attacks." - Primary Repair of a Complex Panfacial Fracture by Dog Bite. (2018) "The results of this retrospective review are aligned mostly with the general trends found in previous national and global studies, supporting the notion that family dogs represent a more significant threat than often is realized and that, among the breeds identified, pit bulls are proportionally linked with more severe bite injuries." - Characteristics of Dog Bites in Arkansas. (2018) " Pit bull bites were implicated in half of all surgeries performed and over 2.5 times as likely to bite in multiple anatomic locations as compared to other breeds." - Characteristics of 1616 Consecutive Dog Bite Injuries at a Single Institution. (2017) The real APBT is still as dangerous as the other pitbull type dogs. They all need to be banned. The UK and Australia understood how dangerous the APBT was, but made the mistake of keeping Staffies and other pitbull type dogs. BSLs can still make the city or country safer. " BSL may have resulted in a reduction of DBIH in Winnipeg, and appeared more effective in protecting those aged <20 years." injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/19/3/177" In 1995, the city hired an attorney who suggested that the city adopt an ordinance prohibiting the oft-maligned dogs from the city, said Kaye Matucheski, city clerk-treasurer for Antigo. The ordinance largely was a preventative measure; Antigo hadn't had any vicious dog attacks, but pit bulls were being blamed for maulings all over the United States, so the city acted before an attack happened rather than waiting to react afterward.
The ordinance the city adopted prohibits pit bulls and mixes of the breed, as well as any other vicious or dangerous animals, from being in the city. In the almost 20 years since it was adopted, Antigo has had no attacks, no maulings, and no dogs killed by pit bulls or other dogs." www.wausaudailyherald.com/story/news/local/2014/07/20/pit-bull-bans-controversial-work/12892813/ |
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Dec 6, 2022 0:29:32 GMT
I upvoted because all that stuff sounds pretty cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by lincoln on Dec 6, 2022 1:53:06 GMT
Those stories I spoke of where only a side fact, which is why i didn’t mention them in the beginning. I am by no means like a dog momma. you are bending and twisting what I say. I don’t claim that any breed attacks more, I’m simply saying if its not a dog people see as dangerous then no one cares. Most of those I didn’t even say. Im Simply saying that misidentification is the reason why “Pitbull” attacks are so high and most people don’t know what a real A.P.B.T is. Misidentification is mostly all I’ve even talked about in this argument Dog attacks are rare BTW I suggest reading what the person said before commenting on it, either you didn’t read it or you misunderstood it Um no. Most dog attacks cause no injuries or very mild ones. Pitbulls, including the APBT, on the other hand... Bites from pit bull terriers were more severe than those of other dogs, with a mean DBCI of 3.2 compared to 2.3. Bites from pit bull terriers had a significantly higher rate of consultation when compared to other breeds, receiving specialty care in 94% of the cases and in 50% of the cases, respectively. Injuries from pit bull terrier bites were significantly more likely to require surgical repair and had five times the rate of operative repair when compared to other breeds. -Dog bites of the head and neck: an evaluation of a common pediatric trauma and associated treatment (2014) " Attacks by pit bulls are associated with higher morbidity rates, higher hospital charges, and a higher risk of death than are attacks by other breeds of dogs. Strict regulation of pit bulls may substantially reduce the US mortality rates related to dog bites." - Mortality, mauling, and maiming by vicious dogs. (2011) Most reviews have suggested that large dogs, such as American Pit Bull Terriers, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds are the main species involved in this type of trauma.16–18 Wolff19 and Morgan et al.20 claimed that American Pit Bull Terriers and German Shepherds are responsible for the majority of fatal attacks. In a retrospective study of 20 maxillofacial canine bite cases, 45% of attacks were made by Pit Bull Terriers. This may be explained by the increasing use of this breed as guard dogs for their aggressiveness and physical imposition.8 These data are in agreement with our findings that most facial fractures were caused by American Pit Bull Terrier attacks." - Primary Repair of a Complex Panfacial Fracture by Dog Bite. (2018) "The results of this retrospective review are aligned mostly with the general trends found in previous national and global studies, supporting the notion that family dogs represent a more significant threat than often is realized and that, among the breeds identified, pit bulls are proportionally linked with more severe bite injuries." - Characteristics of Dog Bites in Arkansas. (2018) " Pit bull bites were implicated in half of all surgeries performed and over 2.5 times as likely to bite in multiple anatomic locations as compared to other breeds." - Characteristics of 1616 Consecutive Dog Bite Injuries at a Single Institution. (2017) The real APBT is still as dangerous as the other pitbull type dogs. They all need to be banned. The UK and Australia understood how dangerous the APBT was, but made the mistake of keeping Staffies and other pitbull type dogs. BSLs can still make the city or country safer. " BSL may have resulted in a reduction of DBIH in Winnipeg, and appeared more effective in protecting those aged <20 years." injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/19/3/177" In 1995, the city hired an attorney who suggested that the city adopt an ordinance prohibiting the oft-maligned dogs from the city, said Kaye Matucheski, city clerk-treasurer for Antigo. The ordinance largely was a preventative measure; Antigo hadn't had any vicious dog attacks, but pit bulls were being blamed for maulings all over the United States, so the city acted before an attack happened rather than waiting to react afterward.
The ordinance the city adopted prohibits pit bulls and mixes of the breed, as well as any other vicious or dangerous animals, from being in the city. In the almost 20 years since it was adopted, Antigo has had no attacks, no maulings, and no dogs killed by pit bulls or other dogs." www.wausaudailyherald.com/story/news/local/2014/07/20/pit-bull-bans-controversial-work/12892813/People can call a dog a Pitbull terrier all they want. That doesn’t stop them from thinking a dog that is not a A.P.B.T a A.P.B.T |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2022 2:24:34 GMT
Um no. Most dog attacks cause no injuries or very mild ones. Pitbulls, including the APBT, on the other hand... Bites from pit bull terriers were more severe than those of other dogs, with a mean DBCI of 3.2 compared to 2.3. Bites from pit bull terriers had a significantly higher rate of consultation when compared to other breeds, receiving specialty care in 94% of the cases and in 50% of the cases, respectively. Injuries from pit bull terrier bites were significantly more likely to require surgical repair and had five times the rate of operative repair when compared to other breeds. -Dog bites of the head and neck: an evaluation of a common pediatric trauma and associated treatment (2014) " Attacks by pit bulls are associated with higher morbidity rates, higher hospital charges, and a higher risk of death than are attacks by other breeds of dogs. Strict regulation of pit bulls may substantially reduce the US mortality rates related to dog bites." - Mortality, mauling, and maiming by vicious dogs. (2011) Most reviews have suggested that large dogs, such as American Pit Bull Terriers, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds are the main species involved in this type of trauma.16–18 Wolff19 and Morgan et al.20 claimed that American Pit Bull Terriers and German Shepherds are responsible for the majority of fatal attacks. In a retrospective study of 20 maxillofacial canine bite cases, 45% of attacks were made by Pit Bull Terriers. This may be explained by the increasing use of this breed as guard dogs for their aggressiveness and physical imposition.8 These data are in agreement with our findings that most facial fractures were caused by American Pit Bull Terrier attacks." - Primary Repair of a Complex Panfacial Fracture by Dog Bite. (2018) "The results of this retrospective review are aligned mostly with the general trends found in previous national and global studies, supporting the notion that family dogs represent a more significant threat than often is realized and that, among the breeds identified, pit bulls are proportionally linked with more severe bite injuries." - Characteristics of Dog Bites in Arkansas. (2018) " Pit bull bites were implicated in half of all surgeries performed and over 2.5 times as likely to bite in multiple anatomic locations as compared to other breeds." - Characteristics of 1616 Consecutive Dog Bite Injuries at a Single Institution. (2017) The real APBT is still as dangerous as the other pitbull type dogs. They all need to be banned. The UK and Australia understood how dangerous the APBT was, but made the mistake of keeping Staffies and other pitbull type dogs. BSLs can still make the city or country safer. " BSL may have resulted in a reduction of DBIH in Winnipeg, and appeared more effective in protecting those aged <20 years." injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/19/3/177" In 1995, the city hired an attorney who suggested that the city adopt an ordinance prohibiting the oft-maligned dogs from the city, said Kaye Matucheski, city clerk-treasurer for Antigo. The ordinance largely was a preventative measure; Antigo hadn't had any vicious dog attacks, but pit bulls were being blamed for maulings all over the United States, so the city acted before an attack happened rather than waiting to react afterward.
The ordinance the city adopted prohibits pit bulls and mixes of the breed, as well as any other vicious or dangerous animals, from being in the city. In the almost 20 years since it was adopted, Antigo has had no attacks, no maulings, and no dogs killed by pit bulls or other dogs." www.wausaudailyherald.com/story/news/local/2014/07/20/pit-bull-bans-controversial-work/12892813/People can call a dog a Pitbull terrier all they want. That doesn’t stop them from thinking a dog that is not a A.P.B.T a A.P.B.T I recommend you find another argument, you have so many arrows in your quiver but you're not pulling them out. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2022 3:06:56 GMT
Those stories I spoke of where only a side fact, which is why i didn’t mention them in the beginning. I am by no means like a dog momma. you are bending and twisting what I say. I don’t claim that any breed attacks more, I’m simply saying if its not a dog people see as dangerous then no one cares. Most of those I didn’t even say. Im Simply saying that misidentification is the reason why “Pitbull” attacks are so high and most people don’t know what a real A.P.B.T is. Misidentification is mostly all I’ve even talked about in this argument Dog attacks are rare BTW I suggest reading what the person said before commenting on it, either you didn’t read it or you misunderstood it Um no. Most dog attacks cause no injuries or very mild ones. Pitbulls, including the APBT, on the other hand... Bites from pit bull terriers were more severe than those of other dogs, with a mean DBCI of 3.2 compared to 2.3. Bites from pit bull terriers had a significantly higher rate of consultation when compared to other breeds, receiving specialty care in 94% of the cases and in 50% of the cases, respectively. Injuries from pit bull terrier bites were significantly more likely to require surgical repair and had five times the rate of operative repair when compared to other breeds. -Dog bites of the head and neck: an evaluation of a common pediatric trauma and associated treatment (2014) " Attacks by pit bulls are associated with higher morbidity rates, higher hospital charges, and a higher risk of death than are attacks by other breeds of dogs. Strict regulation of pit bulls may substantially reduce the US mortality rates related to dog bites." - Mortality, mauling, and maiming by vicious dogs. (2011) Most reviews have suggested that large dogs, such as American Pit Bull Terriers, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds are the main species involved in this type of trauma.16–18 Wolff19 and Morgan et al.20 claimed that American Pit Bull Terriers and German Shepherds are responsible for the majority of fatal attacks. In a retrospective study of 20 maxillofacial canine bite cases, 45% of attacks were made by Pit Bull Terriers. This may be explained by the increasing use of this breed as guard dogs for their aggressiveness and physical imposition.8 These data are in agreement with our findings that most facial fractures were caused by American Pit Bull Terrier attacks." - Primary Repair of a Complex Panfacial Fracture by Dog Bite. (2018) "The results of this retrospective review are aligned mostly with the general trends found in previous national and global studies, supporting the notion that family dogs represent a more significant threat than often is realized and that, among the breeds identified, pit bulls are proportionally linked with more severe bite injuries." - Characteristics of Dog Bites in Arkansas. (2018) " Pit bull bites were implicated in half of all surgeries performed and over 2.5 times as likely to bite in multiple anatomic locations as compared to other breeds." - Characteristics of 1616 Consecutive Dog Bite Injuries at a Single Institution. (2017) The real APBT is still as dangerous as the other pitbull type dogs. They all need to be banned. The UK and Australia understood how dangerous the APBT was, but made the mistake of keeping Staffies and other pitbull type dogs. BSLs can still make the city or country safer. " BSL may have resulted in a reduction of DBIH in Winnipeg, and appeared more effective in protecting those aged <20 years." injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/19/3/177" In 1995, the city hired an attorney who suggested that the city adopt an ordinance prohibiting the oft-maligned dogs from the city, said Kaye Matucheski, city clerk-treasurer for Antigo. The ordinance largely was a preventative measure; Antigo hadn't had any vicious dog attacks, but pit bulls were being blamed for maulings all over the United States, so the city acted before an attack happened rather than waiting to react afterward.
The ordinance the city adopted prohibits pit bulls and mixes of the breed, as well as any other vicious or dangerous animals, from being in the city. In the almost 20 years since it was adopted, Antigo has had no attacks, no maulings, and no dogs killed by pit bulls or other dogs." www.wausaudailyherald.com/story/news/local/2014/07/20/pit-bull-bans-controversial-work/12892813/Oh shit, who would've thought! Pitbulls and German Shepherds have the most damaging bites of all common dogs? Wow!!! I mean we all knew the former because of the Vindolanda study, and we knew the latter because of its dentition and big skull, but god damnit Johnson, you're going places. Meet you in the asylum. Let's go do a drive by on Mike Tyson and light his dangerous ass up, he's too strong for us. Did you see how a black man sucker punched an old woman? Mike Tyson is a public safety risk. Wow, good on the UK for banning pitbulls, now all their pitbulls are staffies. The proof is in the pudding when they banned Tosas, Filas and Dogos that were and are never ever seen in the UK. Meanwhile Australia: www.boardogs.com/Visitors_brag_Page4.htmThey don't just have pitbulls either:  Doesn't look like an effective ban to me. Because nobody cares besides people going off of hearsay, news articles and breed encyclopedias. www.pitbullinfo.org/bsl-is-ineffective.htmlBSL has proven to be inconsistent, there are a multitude of reasons it may have appeared effective. Such as confiscating people's dogs so ultimately having much less dogs around. If it's inconsistent and will just piss people off then doing it is stupid. bvajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/vetr.24 |
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Dec 6, 2022 4:01:27 GMT
The black guy analogy is perfect, but I always assume these anti-pitbull people are racist anyway, so they'll be like "well... yeah, actually" when you ask if we should pre-emptively arrest black people before they commit a crime.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnson on Dec 7, 2022 4:55:27 GMT
Um no. Most dog attacks cause no injuries or very mild ones. Pitbulls, including the APBT, on the other hand... Bites from pit bull terriers were more severe than those of other dogs, with a mean DBCI of 3.2 compared to 2.3. Bites from pit bull terriers had a significantly higher rate of consultation when compared to other breeds, receiving specialty care in 94% of the cases and in 50% of the cases, respectively. Injuries from pit bull terrier bites were significantly more likely to require surgical repair and had five times the rate of operative repair when compared to other breeds. -Dog bites of the head and neck: an evaluation of a common pediatric trauma and associated treatment (2014) " Attacks by pit bulls are associated with higher morbidity rates, higher hospital charges, and a higher risk of death than are attacks by other breeds of dogs. Strict regulation of pit bulls may substantially reduce the US mortality rates related to dog bites." - Mortality, mauling, and maiming by vicious dogs. (2011) Most reviews have suggested that large dogs, such as American Pit Bull Terriers, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds are the main species involved in this type of trauma.16–18 Wolff19 and Morgan et al.20 claimed that American Pit Bull Terriers and German Shepherds are responsible for the majority of fatal attacks. In a retrospective study of 20 maxillofacial canine bite cases, 45% of attacks were made by Pit Bull Terriers. This may be explained by the increasing use of this breed as guard dogs for their aggressiveness and physical imposition.8 These data are in agreement with our findings that most facial fractures were caused by American Pit Bull Terrier attacks." - Primary Repair of a Complex Panfacial Fracture by Dog Bite. (2018) "The results of this retrospective review are aligned mostly with the general trends found in previous national and global studies, supporting the notion that family dogs represent a more significant threat than often is realized and that, among the breeds identified, pit bulls are proportionally linked with more severe bite injuries." - Characteristics of Dog Bites in Arkansas. (2018) " Pit bull bites were implicated in half of all surgeries performed and over 2.5 times as likely to bite in multiple anatomic locations as compared to other breeds." - Characteristics of 1616 Consecutive Dog Bite Injuries at a Single Institution. (2017) The real APBT is still as dangerous as the other pitbull type dogs. They all need to be banned. The UK and Australia understood how dangerous the APBT was, but made the mistake of keeping Staffies and other pitbull type dogs. BSLs can still make the city or country safer. " BSL may have resulted in a reduction of DBIH in Winnipeg, and appeared more effective in protecting those aged <20 years." injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/19/3/177" In 1995, the city hired an attorney who suggested that the city adopt an ordinance prohibiting the oft-maligned dogs from the city, said Kaye Matucheski, city clerk-treasurer for Antigo. The ordinance largely was a preventative measure; Antigo hadn't had any vicious dog attacks, but pit bulls were being blamed for maulings all over the United States, so the city acted before an attack happened rather than waiting to react afterward.
The ordinance the city adopted prohibits pit bulls and mixes of the breed, as well as any other vicious or dangerous animals, from being in the city. In the almost 20 years since it was adopted, Antigo has had no attacks, no maulings, and no dogs killed by pit bulls or other dogs." www.wausaudailyherald.com/story/news/local/2014/07/20/pit-bull-bans-controversial-work/12892813/Oh shit, who would've thought! Pitbulls and German Shepherds have the most damaging bites of all common dogs? Wow!!! I mean we all knew the former because of the Vindolanda study, and we knew the latter because of its dentition and big skull, but god damnit Johnson, you're going places. Meet you in the asylum. Let's go do a drive by on Mike Tyson and light his dangerous ass up, he's too strong for us. Did you see how a black man sucker punched an old woman? Mike Tyson is a public safety risk. Wow, good on the UK for banning pitbulls, now all their pitbulls are staffies. The proof is in the pudding when they banned Tosas, Filas and Dogos that were and are never ever seen in the UK. Meanwhile Australia: www.boardogs.com/Visitors_brag_Page4.htmThey don't just have pitbulls either: Doesn't look like an effective ban to me. Because nobody cares besides people going off of hearsay, news articles and breed encyclopedias. www.pitbullinfo.org/bsl-is-ineffective.htmlBSL has proven to be inconsistent, there are a multitude of reasons it may have appeared effective. Such as confiscating people's dogs so ultimately having much less dogs around. If it's inconsistent and will just piss people off then doing it is stupid. bvajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/vetr.24I am surprised that German Shepherd bites are that dangerous. However is what Cláiton Heitz (PhD),* Guilherme Pivatto Louzada (PhD Candidate),† Ricardo Augusto Conci (PhD) Renato Luiz Rodrigues(PhD),§ and Guilherme Genehr Fritscher( PhD) told me How did you know that I produce movies for The Asylum? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Asylum_filmsThese are surprisingly profitable movies. Might produce a high budget horror movie on pitbulls soon enough, or just a regular documentary since they are demon mutts. I'll allow you to watch the screening. That is racist of you to assume all Black men are violent assaulters. Also racist to stereotype them in a shitbull thread of all places. Sure. Nobody cares until their own child is mauled to death by the shitbull. If they care so much about their nanny dogs being taken away, maybe they should neuter and microchip them? It seems effective. " In 2006, the pit bull ordinance was enacted. The breed was not banned. Owners simply had to get them registered, spay and neuter them, get them microchipped, and post a sign about their dogs." " Before the law, one in three dog bites in town were from pit bulls/pit bull mixes. Those numbers have since decreased dramatically, from 34 cases in 2005 to just 16 last year. Also, before 2006, the city picked up and euthanized hundreds of pit bulls a year. In 2016, just 26 were put down. The department credits multiple things, including the ordinance encouraging responsible pet ownership, microchipping, and adoption programs." www.ky3.com/content/news/Health-department-says-pit-bill-ordinance-works-and-should-not-be-repealed-409727295.html |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2022 5:12:34 GMT
Oh shit, who would've thought! Pitbulls and German Shepherds have the most damaging bites of all common dogs? Wow!!! I mean we all knew the former because of the Vindolanda study, and we knew the latter because of its dentition and big skull, but god damnit Johnson, you're going places. Meet you in the asylum. Let's go do a drive by on Mike Tyson and light his dangerous ass up, he's too strong for us. Did you see how a black man sucker punched an old woman? Mike Tyson is a public safety risk. Wow, good on the UK for banning pitbulls, now all their pitbulls are staffies. The proof is in the pudding when they banned Tosas, Filas and Dogos that were and are never ever seen in the UK. Meanwhile Australia: www.boardogs.com/Visitors_brag_Page4.htmThey don't just have pitbulls either: Doesn't look like an effective ban to me. Because nobody cares besides people going off of hearsay, news articles and breed encyclopedias. www.pitbullinfo.org/bsl-is-ineffective.htmlBSL has proven to be inconsistent, there are a multitude of reasons it may have appeared effective. Such as confiscating people's dogs so ultimately having much less dogs around. If it's inconsistent and will just piss people off then doing it is stupid. bvajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/vetr.24I am surprised that German Shepherd bites are that dangerous. However is what Cláiton Heitz (PhD),* Guilherme Pivatto Louzada (PhD Candidate),† Ricardo Augusto Conci (PhD) Renato Luiz Rodrigues(PhD),§ and Guilherme Genehr Fritscher( PhD) told me How did you know that I produce movies for The Asylum? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Asylum_filmsThese are surprisingly profitable movies. Might produce a high budget horror movie on pitbulls soon enough, or just a regular documentary since they are demon mutts. I'll allow you to watch the screening. That is racist of you to assume all Black men are violent assaulters. Also racist to stereotype them in a shitbull thread of all places. Sure. Nobody cares until their own child is mauled to death by the shitbull. If they care so much about their nanny dogs being taken away, maybe they should neuter and microchip them? It seems effective. " In 2006, the pit bull ordinance was enacted. The breed was not banned. Owners simply had to get them registered, spay and neuter them, get them microchipped, and post a sign about their dogs." " Before the law, one in three dog bites in town were from pit bulls/pit bull mixes. Those numbers have since decreased dramatically, from 34 cases in 2005 to just 16 last year. Also, before 2006, the city picked up and euthanized hundreds of pit bulls a year. In 2016, just 26 were put down. The department credits multiple things, including the ordinance encouraging responsible pet ownership, microchipping, and adoption programs." www.ky3.com/content/news/Health-department-says-pit-bill-ordinance-works-and-should-not-be-repealed-409727295.htmlIf they weren't neutered/spayed and microchipped to begin with maybe their owners are the root of the problem? It's basic sense to do that. |
|
|
|
Post by Johnson on Dec 7, 2022 5:42:30 GMT
Considering pitbulls make 65-70% of fatal attacks by dogs, then I can still save 30-35 people just by simply banning shitbulls. The other dogs just need some retraint and I save all the humans. Even if I do not focus on the other dogs, saving 70% of the population is still a better progression than saving none. Does not need to that much explanation. The bike is an inanimate vehicle that one can choose to ride with safety procedures. The only other option would be for a pitbull to get shot since they go on making rampages. This is why a ban is urgent for this mutt. Not how it works, pitbulls will be replaced. The media started with dobermans, then german shepherds, then rottweilers, then pitbulls. They finally found a tough dog they can demonize, dobermans are weak and pathetic, german shepherds are mediocre and you can make them quit by throwing a rock, rottweilers are still up there but they also don't have the guts to continue their assault. Pitbulls do. This is an awfully recent phenomenon don't you think? I mean in the 1990s and early 2000s I've not observed pitbulls causing destruction, ApexBoy. You cosplaying as a ''Johnson'' doesn't help your case. Pitbulls were still causing the most deaths in the 70s,80s and 90s. Maybe cause Michael Vick popularized them in the 00s, so they got more news attention. Neither ApexBoy nor do I use any other forum apart from Discord. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2022 7:36:55 GMT
Not how it works, pitbulls will be replaced. The media started with dobermans, then german shepherds, then rottweilers, then pitbulls. They finally found a tough dog they can demonize, dobermans are weak and pathetic, german shepherds are mediocre and you can make them quit by throwing a rock, rottweilers are still up there but they also don't have the guts to continue their assault. Pitbulls do. This is an awfully recent phenomenon don't you think? I mean in the 1990s and early 2000s I've not observed pitbulls causing destruction, ApexBoy. You cosplaying as a ''Johnson'' doesn't help your case. Pitbulls were still causing the most deaths in the 70s,80s and 90s. Maybe cause Michael Vick popularized them in the 00s, so they got more news attention. Neither ApexBoy nor do I use any other forum apart from Discord. Well fuck yo homie he dead he a date he lacked out here and they topped him. |
|
pinky
Vegetable
Posts: 15
|
Post by pinky on Dec 21, 2022 6:20:54 GMT
1. Even the ones on leashes can still attack. They could have used a muzzle, but that seems more costly than just not owning this dangerous mutt. You are right the owner is stupid for not knowing shitbulls are dangerous breeds. They just believe the pitbull lobby lies of 'misunderstood' dogs like sheep. 2. Pitbulls are still most likely to bite. " Pit bulls were responsible for the highest percentage of reported bites across all the studies (22.5%), followed by mixed breeds (21.2%), and German shepherds (17.8%)." www.aaha.org/publications/newstat/articles/2019-06/new-study-identifies-most-damaging-dog-bites-by-breed/3. It is one step to reduce shitbull attacks. The other way would be euthanasia. I like the countries which outright banned shitbulls. They have no time for pit lover bullshit. 4. Good for Greyhounds. Shitbulls need to be as far away as possible from children. Nanny dogs of death!  You know why there are so many “Pitbull” attacks? Because people don’t know what a legit A.P.B.T is i recommend learning what a A.P.B.T is before you speak on them I think they are. More likely to lose it, that is. I’d hope you think I know what an APBT is. Mainly, I’d say, from poor breeding by inner city idiots who think a pulling snarling dog is the same as a game one, and I concede by the far the biggest issue is that it’s generally a very noticeable attack as opposed to a collie or w/e but c’mon man, a dog bred to have a prey drive redirected to other dogs isn’t more likely to do so? |
|
