Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2023 13:38:16 GMT
Personally I prefer Tyrannosaurs due to their bone-crushing jaws despite their less functional arms.
*To be clear I meant the large Carcharodontosauridae (Giganotosaurus, Tyrannotitan, Mapusaurus, Carcharodontosaurus) and the large Tyrannosauridae (Tarbosaurus, Tyrannosaurus, Zhuchengtyrannus). Which one is more impressive?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2023 13:38:26 GMT
@ling
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2023 16:09:28 GMT
'Carcharodontosaurs' or Carcharodontosaurus? Anyways, Carcharodontosaurus and others alike had extremely powerful and well-built skulls, possibly being able to lift upwards of 425 kg in their jaws (will post study later). But even so, Tyrannosaurs were just as strong - if not stronger, they're also smarter and have better eyesight. There may be a few exceptions where I'd change the premise, but in most cases the Tyrannosaurs are superior.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2023 17:10:59 GMT
'Carcharodontosaurs' or Carcharodontosaurus? Anyways, Carcharodontosaurus and others alike had extremely powerful and well-built skulls, possibly being able to lift upwards of 425 kg in their jaws (will post study later). But even so, Tyrannosaurs were just as strong - if not stronger, they're also smarter and have better eyesight. There may be a few exceptions where I'd change the premise, but in most cases the Tyrannosaurs are superior. Sorry, to be clear I meant the large Carcharodontosauridae (Giganotosaurus, Tyrannotitan, Mapusaurus, Carcharodontosaurus) and the large Tyrannosauridae (Tarbosaurus, Tyrannosaurus, Zhuchengtyrannus). Which one is more impressive? |
|
