|
|
Post by Johnson on Jan 13, 2023 11:27:47 GMT
Never mind, here is the tweet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2023 11:28:39 GMT
Got to love the shitbulls mauling everyone memes are getting spread around twitter as of recent.     One of your examples is not a pitbull at all. 2 of them aren't. The verdict is out on the other 2 as well. |
|
|
|
Post by Johnson on Jan 13, 2023 11:29:28 GMT
Got to love the shitbulls mauling everyone memes are getting spread around twitter as of recent. Here. Sorry for being a boomer with this format since it is a bit hard to post on mobile. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2023 11:36:22 GMT
Johnson you turned our happy jolly thread into something quite sinister and mean, but don't worry I'll do my fair amount of contribution:  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2023 12:03:48 GMT
Yeah good stuff that's the way to go if he's to stay at home, online distance learning. I've been trying hard not to bring up guardians but yeah you said it, Bolushi shouldn't be having to figure this shit out himself, more should to be done for him. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2023 12:14:16 GMT
Yeah good stuff that's the way to go if he's to stay at home, online distance learning. I've been trying hard not to bring up guardians but yeah you said it, Bolushi shouldn't be having to figure this shit out himself, more should to be done for him. I don't live with my guardian (I live with my great grandparents) but that school stuff is fairly straightforward. My guardian would have to sign me up, right? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2023 12:24:33 GMT
Yeah good stuff that's the way to go if he's to stay at home, online distance learning. I've been trying hard not to bring up guardians but yeah you said it, Bolushi shouldn't be having to figure this shit out himself, more should to be done for him. I don't live with my guardian (I live with my great grandparents) but that school stuff is fairly straightforward. My guardian would have to sign me up, right? To K12? I'd assume so. And on the K12 webpage they talk about parents enrolling their child. |
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Jan 13, 2023 13:14:56 GMT
Got to love the shitbulls mauling everyone memes are getting spread around twitter as of recent. One of your examples is not a pitbull at all. 2 of them aren't. The verdict is out on the other 2 as well. Are you saying Dana White and Joe Rogan aren't pitbulls? |
|
|
|
Post by Johnson on Jan 13, 2023 15:27:46 GMT
Johnson you turned our happy jolly thread into something quite sinister and mean, but don't worry I'll do my fair amount of contribution: 1. If you have a dog study, include the dangers of pitbulls. 2. I had to balance this thread out since my previous discussion with @hardcastle was mainly about Polynesian chicks, hot chicks and fat asses. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2023 23:00:25 GMT
One of your examples is not a pitbull at all. 2 of them aren't. The verdict is out on the other 2 as well. Are you saying Dana White and Joe Rogan aren't pitbulls? Whoops, my mistake. They definitely are. |
|
|
|
Post by lincoln on Jan 14, 2023 5:45:15 GMT
I'd probably include a few pet dogs, to prove they are inferior and different as well, that could be insanely valuable. A neutered pet pitbull, a neutered pet labrador, a neutered rescue mutt... I would hope there would be multiple individuals of each dog, wolf and other canines, just to make it have even more legitimacy, many studies seem to just use one individual and call it a day |
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Jan 14, 2023 9:15:33 GMT
Yes, that's a big problem with most of them. Of course it's probably hugely difficult, but ideally the more data the better.
|
|
|
|
Post by lincoln on Jan 14, 2023 9:27:00 GMT
Yes, that's a big problem with most of them. Of course it's probably hugely difficult, but ideally the more data the better. That’s why I don’t take a ton of studies word for it 100% |
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Jan 14, 2023 9:38:16 GMT
They are often way more limited in the scope of their "proof" than most people think, yes. It's bad enough to think the data is conclusive, but they often go a step further and think the interpretation of the data by the author of the paper based on the data is also conclusive and undebatable, which is absolutely not even kind of true.
The data is real, at least, like they have a wolf bone here with those measurements and that's a fact. It doesn't mean it applies to all wolf bones and doesn't mean more wolf bones couldn't change our perception. Also the analysis of the person making conclusions about the wolf bone is not "a fact" at all. That's a total misunderstanding of what is happening. That's just someone like you talking, their analysis MIGHT be better than yours, might not, don't know. Goes on a case by case basis.
Raw data is at least "a clue", that's the most we can categorically state with confidence.
|
|
