Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2023 18:37:46 GMT
 vs.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2023 18:45:57 GMT
"Using more complete remains, it was estimated in 1999 that the size attained by specimens of Deinosuchus varied from 8 to 10 meters (26 to 33 ft) with weights from 2.5 to 5 metric tons (2.8 to 5.5 short tons)." "...the largest fragmentary remains of D. riograndensis were 1.5 times the size of those of the average D. rugosus and it was determined that the largest individuals of this species may have been up to 12 meters (39 ft) in length and perhaps weighed as much as 8.5 metric tons (9.4 short tons)." 10 and 12 m long Deinosuchus compared to 'Scoty' the Tyrannosaurus rex.  Attachments:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2023 18:51:44 GMT
Similar to Sarcosuchus vs Zhuchengtyrannus imo, except the crocodilian is more powerful. I maintain my position that the crocodilian wins in the water and the tyrannosaur wins on land.
|
|
