Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2023 4:12:41 GMT
 vs  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2023 4:13:09 GMT
I think Sachicasaurus would win due to its size advantage.
@ling What do you think?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2023 16:34:22 GMT
Iirc Sahicasaurus had skinny teeth and had relatively narrow jaws, perfect for catching slippery fish, but not perfect for catching large sea monsters that also surrounded it's waters i.e. Monquirasaurus (which for the record, had very robust teeth and a short, wide jaw).
So probably Monquirasaurus.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2023 16:36:57 GMT
Iirc Sahicasaurus had skinny teeth and had relatively narrow jaws, perfect for catching slippery fish, but not perfect for catching large sea monsters that also surrounded it's waters i.e. Monquirasaurus (which for the record, had very robust teeth and a short, wide jaw). So probably Monquirasaurus. Wait did Monquirasaurus and Sahicasaurus inhabit the same areas? I can't remember it's been like 20293746482039473 years since I've invested decent time into pliosaurids. |
|
