Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2023 21:41:46 GMT
Zergthe is so high in the list? A medium tier Cat fan like ApexBoy managed to counteract his sources and point out how overrated the Chimp's predation feats/offenseive abilites are. carnivora.net/chimpanzee-fighting-ability-t12644.html#p239199Also, Black Ice is that high in the list? He is a whiny wolfaboo. I believe he made a lot of sense but his striker beats wrestler opinions were misguided and wrong. His comparisons on wolves and dogs were OK, like I agree with wolves and wolfdogs doing better against grippers in a backyard skirmish and it was interesting hearing about that. Do you agree with him that wolf beats hyena? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2023 21:44:02 GMT
I don't particularly love the template if I'm being honest. There's just such a huge gap between people who are in the same category. A tier list format would be better. EG-  (note I do not share the views of this tier list example) I’ve never seen many of the “smart” members lose in a debate. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2023 21:51:21 GMT
Apexboy is smart, he's as cunning as a shithouse rat. Taipan is also smart, just evil. I mean they're not as smart as me, but by carnivora standards there are many layers below those guys. Should the people who provide sources be in a high rank? How exactly are we defining smart? That matters. |
|
|
|
Post by Johnson on Jan 6, 2023 22:37:52 GMT
Should the people who provide sources be in a high rank? How exactly are we defining smart? That matters. The sources provided can be used in future arguments, like this. carnivora.net/chimpanzee-fighting-ability-t12644.html#p239199 Which is why you got to remove Black Ice and Dainsleif from there. Fumik also is weird. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2023 22:52:38 GMT
I believe he made a lot of sense but his striker beats wrestler opinions were misguided and wrong. His comparisons on wolves and dogs were OK, like I agree with wolves and wolfdogs doing better against grippers in a backyard skirmish and it was interesting hearing about that. Do you agree with him that wolf beats hyena? Yes, given a large male "bulldog" wolf. |
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Jan 6, 2023 23:45:33 GMT
I don't particularly love the template if I'm being honest. There's just such a huge gap between people who are in the same category. A tier list format would be better. EG- (note I do not share the views of this tier list example) Why is S at the top? S is supreme/superb/super (something like that). "A" means like perfectly solidly great. They get an "a", perfect. Nothing wrong with something that is an A. S means better than that, like there's x-factor you didn't even anticipate was possible. S is transcendant. B is like good but with some noticeable negatives. C is equal negatives and positives. D is more negative than positive. E is very negative. And F is like WOW, didn't even know something could suck that hard. Felinepower would be like your classic F tier poster. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2023 3:21:35 GMT
Bolushi, next time you create an alt on Carnivora don’t include dogs in your profile picture or username.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2023 3:23:16 GMT
Bolushi, next time you create an alt on Carnivora don’t include dogs in your profile picture or username. "Catbulldog" was not in any way criminalizing, though "IceWolf55" with a bullstag picture was a bad move. My signature and sighthound hunting pictures fucked me. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2023 3:26:19 GMT
And that's a wrap!  Pretty even across the board. Whaddaya guys think? Did I forget anyone? Hardcastle Bolushi @ling @johnson Zergthe is so high in the list? A medium tier Cat fan like ApexBoy managed to counteract his sources and point out how overrated the Chimp's predation feats/offenseive abilites are. carnivora.net/chimpanzee-fighting-ability-t12644.html#p239199Also, Black Ice is that high in the list? He is a whiny wolfaboo. I see an older version of Bolushi in Black Ice. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2023 3:27:50 GMT
Should the people who provide sources be in a high rank? Not necessarily. Depends. If they have an intelligent argument they punctuate with sources that could make them a formidable force (reddhole springs to mind), but others might just provide sources for their dumb argument which don't even really support their point and they could be a total moron. I personally never liked using them. Never comes naturally. Is always a burden to track down my sources after the fact. I am a source. I've absorbed a lifetime of observations which I've obsessively analysed with my high IQ and that's what I bring to the table. I didn't keep track of my sources, it's just not how I operate. I understand this isn't ideal when debating with people who are motivated to scrutinise and pick at any chink (heh) in your armour, and I've had to adapt and become extra persuasive with my debating style. We all have weaknesses and that would be one of mine. I acknowledge it is a weakness, but it is what it is. It would be awkward if I had science nerd abilities on top of everything else. I'd be too OP. I also btw see it as limiting to be held back by a need to wait until you find the right source before moving forward with conclusions and on to the next point. I make observations and move quickly. Source slaves end up way behind trudging along slowly. The flipside can be mistakes I need to come back and acknowledge and correct. That's fine. Have you ever had an actual IQ test? If so, what did you get? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2023 3:29:27 GMT
Zergthe is so high in the list? A medium tier Cat fan like ApexBoy managed to counteract his sources and point out how overrated the Chimp's predation feats/offenseive abilites are. carnivora.net/chimpanzee-fighting-ability-t12644.html#p239199Also, Black Ice is that high in the list? He is a whiny wolfaboo. I see an older version of Bolushi in Black Ice. I am Black Ice except I climbed into the dog boat with Dale Earnfart. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2023 3:32:21 GMT
I see an older version of Bolushi in Black Ice. I am Black Ice except I climbed into the dog boat with Dale Earnfart. He was in the military. Maybe you should consider it too? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2023 3:45:27 GMT
I am Black Ice except I climbed into the dog boat with Dale Earnfart. He was in the military. Maybe you should consider it too? Yes, I'd do anything to go and have a 20% chance to get my clumsy stupid ass shot down in a war... lol *gunfire* "COVER ME, RELOADING" "I dropped my gun, help!!!" *begins to lack* Enemy: 25 points - HEADSHOT 25 points - HEADSHOT 25 points - HEADSHOT 25 points - HEADSHOT Level Up! I don't know shit about the military and doubt I would qualify. |
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Jan 7, 2023 4:42:55 GMT
Joining the military does seem like a losers move... dunno, can be a ticket to easy street though if you get lucky and weasel your way through without doing any thing that dangerous. Military pensions seem pretty cool.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2023 18:05:15 GMT
Should the people who provide sources be in a high rank? Not necessarily. Depends. If they have an intelligent argument they punctuate with sources that could make them a formidable force (reddhole springs to mind), but others might just provide sources for their dumb argument which don't even really support their point and they could be a total moron. I personally never liked using them. Never comes naturally. Is always a burden to track down my sources after the fact. I am a source. I've absorbed a lifetime of observations which I've obsessively analysed with my high IQ and that's what I bring to the table. I didn't keep track of my sources, it's just not how I operate. I understand this isn't ideal when debating with people who are motivated to scrutinise and pick at any chink (heh) in your armour, and I've had to adapt and become extra persuasive with my debating style. We all have weaknesses and that would be one of mine. I acknowledge it is a weakness, but it is what it is. It would be awkward if I had science nerd abilities on top of everything else. I'd be too OP. I also btw see it as limiting to be held back by a need to wait until you find the right source before moving forward with conclusions and on to the next point. I make observations and move quickly. Source slaves end up way behind trudging along slowly. The flipside can be mistakes I need to come back and acknowledge and correct. That's fine. Opinion-based arguments can move along much faster than strictly fact-based arguments IMO. |
|
Pretty even across the board. Whaddaya guys think? Did I forget anyone?