Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2023 19:23:52 GMT
New ranking. 1. Hardcastle (92.839473894638283628) 2. @ajay (84.93749373937338373373738273463) 3. Bolushi (80.0183739373739337392728266116194) 4. CoolJohnson and lincoln (74.0294739383382928) 5. Undecided. Lol very accurate down to the millionth decimal point. But I'm in "G" tier, G for GOAT  I'd like to rank Undertaker but need to find time to go through his posts first. I've seen a few of his posts and I'm like yeah maybe there is something here. But I need to read more. After what Hardcastle said I'm wondering whether we have a second member above B-tier besides Hardcastle. That's a hard thing to do and there aren't many A-tierers, just to be in B-tier you already have to be rather smart and/or knowledge on animals. OldGreenGrolar is a bogey I can't rate right now, probably an old-timer that's got nothing to prove and keeps his cards close to his chest. I probably shouldn't say there's no more extra B-tierers right now beside Hardcastle and possibly Undertaker, who knows what OGG is capable of. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2023 19:26:39 GMT
New ranking. 1. Hardcastle (92.839473894638283628) 2. @ajay (84.93749373937338373373738273463) 3. Bolushi (80.0183739373739337392728266116194) 4. CoolJohnson and lincoln (74.0294739383382928) 5. Undecided. Lol very accurate down to the millionth decimal point. But I'm in "G" tier, G for GOAT I'd like to rank Undertaker but need to find time to go through his posts first. After what Hardcastle said I'm wondering whether we have a second member above B-tier besides Hardcastle. That's a hard thing to do and there aren't many A-tierers, just to be in B-tier you already have to be rather smart and/or knowledge on animals. OldGreenGrolar is a bogey I can't rate right now, probably an old-timer that's got nothing to prove and keeps his cards close to his chest. I probably shouldn't say there's no more extra B-tierers right now beside Hardcastle and possibly Undertaker, who knows what OGG is capable of. > Hardcastle imo. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2023 19:29:01 GMT
Lol very accurate down to the millionth decimal point. But I'm in "G" tier, G for GOAT I'd like to rank Undertaker but need to find time to go through his posts first. After what Hardcastle said I'm wondering whether we have a second member above B-tier besides Hardcastle. That's a hard thing to do and there aren't many A-tierers, just to be in B-tier you already have to be rather smart and/or knowledge on animals. OldGreenGrolar is a bogey I can't rate right now, probably an old-timer that's got nothing to prove and keeps his cards close to his chest. I probably shouldn't say there's no more extra B-tierers right now beside Hardcastle and possibly Undertaker, who knows what OGG is capable of. > Hardcastle imo. Wow. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2023 19:46:27 GMT
You're surprised? The Undertaker makes size comparisons that are really high quality. Even going as far as to estimate an animal's weight/height/length, etc, by measuring other, smaller, key components that make up the animal like tooth size, number of vertebrae, femur length, or whatever (those were just random examples that used to give you an idea of what I mean). And don't get me wrong, Hardcastle's a smart guy, but just not as smart as The Undertaker in my opinion. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2023 19:48:58 GMT
Lol very accurate down to the millionth decimal point. But I'm in "G" tier, G for GOAT I'd like to rank Undertaker but need to find time to go through his posts first. After what Hardcastle said I'm wondering whether we have a second member above B-tier besides Hardcastle. That's a hard thing to do and there aren't many A-tierers, just to be in B-tier you already have to be rather smart and/or knowledge on animals. OldGreenGrolar is a bogey I can't rate right now, probably an old-timer that's got nothing to prove and keeps his cards close to his chest. I probably shouldn't say there's no more extra B-tierers right now beside Hardcastle and possibly Undertaker, who knows what OGG is capable of. > Hardcastle imo. But really at 21 or 23 or whatever he's too young to be hitting S-tier unless he's a complete American psycho. Even Bolushi probably won't be hitting S-tier by 23. Comfortable A-tier for sure but at minimum Bolushi probably needs to see his late 20s for S-tier. S-tier people are probably drawing a lot from beyond just animal knowledge to inform their animal knowledge and smarts. History, philosophy... years of experience gaining animal WISDOM, a load of reading over like decades processing ideas. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2023 19:52:56 GMT
You're surprised? The Undertaker makes size comparisons that are really high quality. Even going as far as to estimate an animal's weight/height/length, etc, by measuring other, smaller, key components that make up the animal like tooth size, number of vertebrae, femur length, or whatever (those were just random examples that used to give you an idea of what I mean). And don't get me wrong, Hardcastle's a smart guy, but just not as smart as The Undertaker in my opinion. Well yeah I'd be surprised! But that's cool I like a good surprise every now and then. Yes he seems to really get into the intellectual analysis side of animals and is extremely smart. I really do need to see more of his posts. |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJohnson on Feb 14, 2023 20:34:12 GMT
New ranking. 1. Hardcastle (92.839473894638283628) 2. @ajay (84.93749373937338373373738273463) 3. Bolushi (80.0183739373739337392728266116194) 4. CoolJohnson and lincoln (74.0294739383382928) 5. Undecided. I am mildly offended about my position on this intelligence tier list. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2023 20:39:55 GMT
New ranking. 1. Hardcastle (92.839473894638283628) 2. @ajay (84.93749373937338373373738273463) 3. Bolushi (80.0183739373739337392728266116194) 4. CoolJohnson and lincoln (74.0294739383382928) 5. Undecided. I am mildly offended about my position on this intelligence tier list. I know I'm a little wtf at how they keep rating you. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2023 20:42:26 GMT
New ranking. 1. Hardcastle (92.839473894638283628) 2. @ajay (84.93749373937338373373738273463) 3. Bolushi (80.0183739373739337392728266116194) 4. CoolJohnson and lincoln (74.0294739383382928) 5. Undecided. I am mildly offended about my position on this intelligence tier list. I think you only post on a few threads. Sorry. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2023 21:13:46 GMT
Lincoln is definitely smarter than CoolJohnson, lol. He knows his stuff but doesn't really argue or make long posts so it doesn't come out in wash too often.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Feb 14, 2023 21:29:19 GMT
I earlier rated theundertaker45 "in the 80s", based on old carnivora posts. TBH I had low 80s in mind. I would upgrade that now based on posts here to 90s. I was thinking that before @ling even said that, when I was going to respond to CoolJohnson yesterday but ran out of time (and then forgot, happens a lot). I was going to "correct" myself on the undertaker rating in the quote, and then cover cooljohnson's requests. Rating him above me is not something I would agree with (remember I am not a humble man), BUT it makes sense Ling would say that. Lol. It's not the worst take if I'm keeping it real. He is only posting very solid stuff, while I am posting mostly shit The stars have to align for my full form to come out. He's certainly my superior academically. I'm an "artiste". lol. So yeah I can see that argument. I'd still probably say low 90s, but with high 90s potential, where only Chui and Reddhole reside (for me). Have I scored anyone out of 100 yet? You were decent, funny and rational. I can't place you up with the goats because I feel like you kept a pretty low profile. But you were one of those guys I could count on to at least understand what I was saying, and I valued guys like that. I guess.. low 80s? 81. Doesn't mean much until I do everyone else. I'll just say now I would put Reddhole and Chui as high 90s. Me and Vita as low/mid 90s. High 80s maybe Brogan, Lycaon mid 80s. Low 80s would be a lot of cool posters who didn't necessarily make a big impact but were solid. There were louder more noteworthy people I'd place below you. Gato Gordo for example. An epic poster but too stupid to be in the 80s. Too incapable of comprehending logic. I'd say he was high 70s or just 80. That chick with all the skulls and cojimar the size autist I'd say were mid-high 80s. I hate to admit it, but taipan is probably 80s in intelligence. Low 0s in character and integrity, but 80s in intelligence. I may even begrudgingly put apexboy in low 80s. Undertaker in the 80s. Shin I'd say low 70s. Mondas mid 60s. Menvidas/andres in the 50s. Comfylounge also in the 50s. Felinepower in the 20s. You'd have to feed me more names... Here are some members. Black Ice, Canidae, Comfylounge, Forbiddenip, Mustang, Reichenowi, Ryo, Shortridge, Twico5, Zergthe Black Ice- Honestly like him but was never blinded by his intellect. I'm gonna say 74 Canidae - This is a tough one because my memory of him is vague but positive, if that makes sense. I think he was a high 80s kind of guy, if I have the right guy in mind. Comfylounge - I already put him in the 50s, I think that was kind of spiteful tbh. I'm gonna say a real intelligence rating, disregarding what a fuckface he is - 75 Forbiddenip - I seem to recall him being a moron? But I'm not sure, it's like the reverse of Canidae, vague recollection of him but it's negative. I feel like I've written "Forbiddenip" mockingly to ridicule cat fans in the same way I might write felinepower or mondas. May be a legit 50s grading. Don't hold me to it, I may be thinking of the wrong guy. Mustang - I honestly think he's stupid. Or, let me rephrase. I think he knows absolutely nothing about dogs or animals (even if he collects lizards or whatever). He just clearly didn't. I guess maybe he secretly had intelligence for his job in Lebanon or whatever, maybe he was an engineer designing earthquake-proof buildings in Turkey, I have no idea, but he was a clueless non entity when it came to animal analysis. I don't think I can rate him at all. Reichenowi - really don't know who that is. Ryo - always there, but pretty low key. I have I think mostly positive experiences with him and want to say low 80s or high 70s but I can't escape from the fact his input was somewhat forgettable so again I don't really know. Shortridge and twice - no idea Zergthe - again I feel like I need to do a refresher course and read carnivora history to rate these guys. I have a vague positive association with the name. I am thinking another low 80s guy. Btw CoolJohnson seems super smart to me, he's just a dog hating asshole. Two different categories. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2023 21:44:25 GMT
''engineer designing earthquake-proof buildings in Turkey''
Did you say that in light of the Turkish earthquake that happened a few milliseconds ago?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2023 21:47:56 GMT
I earlier rated theundertaker45 "in the 80s", based on old carnivora posts. TBH I had low 80s in mind. I would upgrade that now based on posts here to 90s. I was thinking that before @ling even said that, when I was going to respond to CoolJohnson yesterday but ran out of time (and then forgot, happens a lot). I was going to "correct" myself on the undertaker rating in the quote, and then cover cooljohnson's requests. Rating him above me is not something I would agree with (remember I am not a humble man), BUT it makes sense Ling would say that. Lol. It's not the worst take if I'm keeping it real. He is only posting very solid stuff, while I am posting mostly shit The stars have to align for my full form to come out. He's certainly my superior academically. I'm an "artiste". lol. So yeah I can see that argument. I'd still probably say low 90s, but with high 90s potential, where only Chui and Reddhole reside (for me). Hardcastle Here are some members. Black Ice, Canidae, Comfylounge, Forbiddenip, Mustang, Reichenowi, Ryo, Shortridge, Twico5, Zergthe Black Ice- Honestly like him but was never blinded by his intellect. I'm gonna say 74 Canidae - This is a tough one because my memory of him is vague but positive, if that makes sense. I think he was a high 80s kind of guy, if I have the right guy in mind. Comfylounge - I already put him in the 50s, I think that was kind of spiteful tbh. I'm gonna say a real intelligence rating, disregarding what a fuckface he is - 75 Forbiddenip - I seem to recall him being a moron? But I'm not sure, it's like the reverse of Canidae, vague recollection of him but it's negative. I feel like I've written "Forbiddenip" mockingly to ridicule cat fans in the same way I might write felinepower or mondas. May be a legit 50s grading. Don't hold me to it, I may be thinking of the wrong guy. Mustang - I honestly think he's stupid. Or, let me rephrase. I think he knows absolutely nothing about dogs or animals (even if he collects lizards or whatever). He just clearly didn't. I guess maybe he secretly had intelligence for his job in Lebanon or whatever, maybe he was an engineer designing earthquake-proof buildings in Turkey, I have no idea, but he was a clueless non entity when it came to animal analysis. I don't think I can rate him at all. Reichenowi - really don't know who that is. Ryo - always there, but pretty low key. I have I think mostly positive experiences with him and want to say low 80s or high 70s but I can't escape from the fact his input was somewhat forgettable so again I don't really know. Shortridge and twice - no idea Zergthe - again I feel like I need to do a refresher course and read carnivora history to rate these guys. I have a vague positive association with the name. I am thinking another low 80s guy. Btw CoolJohnson seems super smart to me, he's just a dog hating asshole. Two different categories. Can you link me a match-up on Carnivora that Chui posted on? I want to see what this guy is all about. |
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Feb 24, 2023 12:05:36 GMT
I earlier rated theundertaker45 "in the 80s", based on old carnivora posts. TBH I had low 80s in mind. I would upgrade that now based on posts here to 90s. I was thinking that before @ling even said that, when I was going to respond to CoolJohnson yesterday but ran out of time (and then forgot, happens a lot). I was going to "correct" myself on the undertaker rating in the quote, and then cover cooljohnson's requests. Rating him above me is not something I would agree with (remember I am not a humble man), BUT it makes sense Ling would say that. Lol. It's not the worst take if I'm keeping it real. He is only posting very solid stuff, while I am posting mostly shit The stars have to align for my full form to come out. He's certainly my superior academically. I'm an "artiste". lol. So yeah I can see that argument. I'd still probably say low 90s, but with high 90s potential, where only Chui and Reddhole reside (for me). Black Ice- Honestly like him but was never blinded by his intellect. I'm gonna say 74 Canidae - This is a tough one because my memory of him is vague but positive, if that makes sense. I think he was a high 80s kind of guy, if I have the right guy in mind. Comfylounge - I already put him in the 50s, I think that was kind of spiteful tbh. I'm gonna say a real intelligence rating, disregarding what a fuckface he is - 75 Forbiddenip - I seem to recall him being a moron? But I'm not sure, it's like the reverse of Canidae, vague recollection of him but it's negative. I feel like I've written "Forbiddenip" mockingly to ridicule cat fans in the same way I might write felinepower or mondas. May be a legit 50s grading. Don't hold me to it, I may be thinking of the wrong guy. Mustang - I honestly think he's stupid. Or, let me rephrase. I think he knows absolutely nothing about dogs or animals (even if he collects lizards or whatever). He just clearly didn't. I guess maybe he secretly had intelligence for his job in Lebanon or whatever, maybe he was an engineer designing earthquake-proof buildings in Turkey, I have no idea, but he was a clueless non entity when it came to animal analysis. I don't think I can rate him at all. Reichenowi - really don't know who that is. Ryo - always there, but pretty low key. I have I think mostly positive experiences with him and want to say low 80s or high 70s but I can't escape from the fact his input was somewhat forgettable so again I don't really know. Shortridge and twice - no idea Zergthe - again I feel like I need to do a refresher course and read carnivora history to rate these guys. I have a vague positive association with the name. I am thinking another low 80s guy. Btw CoolJohnson seems super smart to me, he's just a dog hating asshole. Two different categories. Can you link me a match-up on Carnivora that Chui posted on? I want to see what this guy is all about. Some good Chui links, no post in particular just try and follow these conversations through, when you have the time. He gives me legitimate trouble in some of these, and in a respectful way where he's acknowledging my points, fully understanding them, and responding with valid counter arguments. I'm actually grateful when I meet someone who can do that. It's very very very rare. Worst fighter of the big catsCougar vs LeopardCougar vs Bully KuttaCape Leopard vs Dogo ArgentinoLeopard vs Mexican JaguarJaguaress vs Sri Lankan LeopardPantanal Jaguar vs Sumatran TigerThe bulk of his work is in extinct forums which no longer exist (even former incarnations of carnivora), same as me. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 22:45:52 GMT
I intentionally didn't rate them but I can't tell. They're a spineless worm and I don't know. However based on their knowledge about felines (Intentionally going for their area of ''expertise) they're at about a (35). It's much lower overall. Wyatt is weird, and his knowledge seems exclusive to Spitz/Ferals/Herders. He still was peculiar ideas in that field. He feeds into me pretty much. He has gotten smarter than he was before. Maybe a (70) I'm intrigued, just being interested in spitz/ferals/herders as a specialty indicates to me some intelligence. I just haven't seen enough to say anything. Well the reason Spitz/Herders/Ferals are my knowledge is its just relates to where my interests lay. I study wildlife biology, so getting and looking into more primitive dogs like Spitz/Herders/Ferals interests me more than getting a Bulldog or Bloodhound or something. I still like gripping dogs, and would feed, pet and hunt with one, but Spitz/Herders/Ferals match what I like and want more. They are the closest we can to exactly like their wild ancestor, another reason. |
|
