Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2023 12:04:24 GMT
It's high time I fix that graph, there's minor issues and confusions with the dogs, and while I'm at it I could add smilodons (fatalis and populator) and possibly dire wolves. Can you add the Brown bear too?
|
|
kevin
Ruminant
Posts: 152
|
Post by kevin on Jul 5, 2023 12:07:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Jul 5, 2023 12:11:24 GMT
It's high time I fix that graph, there's minor issues and confusions with the dogs, and while I'm at it I could add smilodons (fatalis and populator) and possibly dire wolves. Can you add the Brown bear too? Yeah it was oddly absent from the carnivore limb robusticity study I think, but I will add it in accordance with Kevin's figures. Could add others as well. Red foxes and dingoes spring to mind. Edit - well we now have eurasian red fox, not even sure if it is different from american yet (just realised american is in there).
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Jul 5, 2023 12:30:50 GMT
May have to start from scratch, I can't find the original and just grabbing these images they are kind of small and unclear. So yeah, give me time.
|
|
kevin
Ruminant
Posts: 152
|
Post by kevin on Jul 7, 2023 10:01:56 GMT
|
|
kevin
Ruminant
Posts: 152
|
Post by kevin on Jul 9, 2023 16:05:28 GMT
Scientific evidence of Smilodon fatalis having proportionally stronger shoulders than Wolverines : Scapula Shape Index: It's scapula width/forelimb length ratio.Higher score indicates greater muscle attachement on the shoulder joint as well as greater ability to make certain movements like full-functional upper extremity movement including protraction, retraction, elevation, depression, upward rotation,and downward rotation all else being equal. S.Fatalis : 24% G.Gulo : 19% Edge : S.Fatalis Scapula Length Index: Scapula length divided by Forelimb length.Higher score Indicates exertion of greater force from the Forelimb. S.Fatalis : 33% G.Gulo : 27% Edge : S.Fatalis API: Acromion process length/forelimb length.Higher score in this ratio increases attachment for the deltoid muscle. S.Fatalis : 2% G.Gulo : 4% Edge : G.Gulo SMI: Deltopectoral crest length divided by humerus length. Higher score Displays greater mechanical advantage of deltoid and pectoral muscles at the shoulder joint. S.Fatalis : 64% G.Gulo : 53% Edge : S.Fatalis Overall : S.Fatalis References: www.researchgate.net/p..._living_and_extinct_carnivoresacademic.oup.com/zooli...nean/article/151/4/833/2607398
|
|
kevin
Ruminant
Posts: 152
|
Post by kevin on Jul 9, 2023 16:09:50 GMT
|
|
kevin
Ruminant
Posts: 152
|
Post by kevin on Jul 9, 2023 16:20:11 GMT
Scientific evidence of Smilodon fatalis having proportionally stronger shoulders than honey badgers : Scapula Shape Index: It's scapula width/forelimb length ratio.Higher score indicates greater muscle attachement on the shoulder joint as well as greater ability to make certain movements like full-functional upper extremity movement including protraction, retraction, elevation, depression, upward rotation,and downward rotation all else being equal. S.Fatalis : 24% M.Capensis : 20% Edge : S.Fatalis Scapula Length Index: Scapula length divided by Forelimb length.Higher score Indicates exertion of greater force from the Forelimb. S.Fatalis : 33% M.Capensis : 30% Edge : S.Fatalis API: Acromion process length/forelimb length.Higher score in this ratio increases attachment for the deltoid muscle. S.Fatalis : 2% M.Capensis : 6% Edge : M.Capensis SMI: Deltopectoral crest length divided by humerus length. Higher score Displays greater mechanical advantage of deltoid and pectoral muscles at the shoulder joint. S.Fatalis : 64% M.Capensis : 54% Edge : S.Fatalis Overall : S.Fatalis References: www.researchgate.net/p..._living_and_extinct_carnivoresacademic.oup.com/zooli...nean/article/151/4/833/2607398
|
|
kevin
Ruminant
Posts: 152
|
Post by kevin on Jul 9, 2023 23:06:04 GMT
Comparing Smilodon fatalis and the Pleistocene Rancho la brea grizzly bear : justpaste.it/849bm
|
|
kevin
Ruminant
Posts: 152
|
Post by kevin on Jul 9, 2023 23:08:36 GMT
|
|
kevin
Ruminant
Posts: 152
|
Post by kevin on Jul 11, 2023 10:16:32 GMT
|
|
kevin
Ruminant
Posts: 152
|
Post by kevin on Jul 14, 2023 14:23:34 GMT
Relative humerus robusticity comparison between Smilodon Populator and Xenosmilus Hodsonae ! HRI : It is humerus mediolateral diameter at mid-shaft/humerus length.Robust forelimb bones protect the animal from violent stresses during grappling. S.Populator : 11% X.Hodsonae : 10% Edge : S.Populator HRI2 : It is humerus anteroposterior diameter at mid-shaft/humerus length. Robust forelimb bones protect the animal from violent stresses during grappling. S.Populator : 14% X.Hodsonae : 12% Edge : S.Populator Overall : S.Populator References : pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16235255books.google.co.ma/boo...n%20hemisphere&f=false
|
|
kevin
Ruminant
Posts: 152
|
Post by kevin on Jul 18, 2023 21:42:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by s on Aug 28, 2023 14:42:40 GMT
May have to start from scratch, I can't find the original and just grabbing these images they are kind of small and unclear. So yeah, give me time. Hardcastle i have a genuine question, at a parity weight of your choice, who would you back between Smilodon Populator/Smilodon Fatalis (assume it's a mini-version, much smaller but is just as proportionally robust as their standard versions and it's weaponry is just as powerful proportionally) and an elite best of the best Bulldog, Hércules or Camoral tier?
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Aug 28, 2023 15:58:08 GMT
May have to start from scratch, I can't find the original and just grabbing these images they are kind of small and unclear. So yeah, give me time. Hardcastle i have a genuine question, at a parity weight of your choice, who would you back between Smilodon Populator/Smilodon Fatalis (assume it's a mini-version, much smaller but is just as proportionally robust as their standard versions and it's weaponry is just as powerful proportionally) and an elite best of the best Bulldog, Hércules or Camoral tier? Well in case you missed the updated robusticity chart- Forget about me, everyone should basically follow this chart. Or basically to go against it you need a good argument and good evidence, this should be the "common sense" baseline.
|
|