Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2022 21:19:20 GMT
vs
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2022 21:22:54 GMT
The SBT has quite the skull: Its sagittal crest and teeth look more impressive to me. The wolverine's molars are for feeding, and they still don't look as impressive as the SBT. I think the SBT shakes the wolverine to death. Not without injury though.
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Nov 13, 2022 3:14:04 GMT
The SBT has quite the skull: Its sagittal crest and teeth look more impressive to me. The wolverine's molars are for feeding, and they still don't look as impressive as the SBT. I think the SBT shakes the wolverine to death. Not without injury though. Skull difference is worse than that makes it look. The SBT skull is about 22% longer and 25% wider. It actually totally mammoths the wolverine skull. Skull comparison looks terrible for the wolverine BUT I do subscribe to the idea wolverines are weirdly difficult contenders (more so than Honey badgers who have all the reputation, because wolverines can actually kill and kill big). I favour a good SBT but it's gonna have a hell of a time, hardest fight for it from a wild animal it's own size.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2022 3:16:48 GMT
The SBT has quite the skull: Its sagittal crest and teeth look more impressive to me. The wolverine's molars are for feeding, and they still don't look as impressive as the SBT. I think the SBT shakes the wolverine to death. Not without injury though. Skull difference is worse than that makes it look. The SBT skull is about 22% longer and 25% wider. It actually totally mammoths the wolverine skull. Skull comparison looks terrible for the wolverine BUT I do subscribe to the idea wolverines are weirdly difficult contenders (more so than Honey badgers who have all the reputation, because wolverines can actually kill and kill big). I favour a good SBT but it's gonna have a hell of a time, hardest fight for it from a wild animal it's own size. Wouldn't you say CL would be harder just because it has more potential to kill instead of maul like the wolverine? I think there's a difference between hanging tough in a losing battle vs not hanging tough but having more tools to actually kill should it get an upper-hand for a second.
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Nov 13, 2022 3:29:04 GMT
Skull difference is worse than that makes it look. The SBT skull is about 22% longer and 25% wider. It actually totally mammoths the wolverine skull. Skull comparison looks terrible for the wolverine BUT I do subscribe to the idea wolverines are weirdly difficult contenders (more so than Honey badgers who have all the reputation, because wolverines can actually kill and kill big). I favour a good SBT but it's gonna have a hell of a time, hardest fight for it from a wild animal it's own size. Wouldn't you say CL would be harder just because it has more potential to kill instead of maul like the wolverine? I think there's a difference between hanging tough in a losing battle vs not hanging tough but having more tools to actually kill should it get an upper-hand for a second. I'd agree with you if we were talking about the honey badger, but the wolverine does kill stuff. They have killed big ungulates and are on record easily killing coyotes. It has big time durability and stamina and then also some killing, that's a rough combo. Makes for a good fighter. Honey badger is bullcrap, all hype, but wolverines I think are legit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2022 3:48:05 GMT
Wouldn't you say CL would be harder just because it has more potential to kill instead of maul like the wolverine? I think there's a difference between hanging tough in a losing battle vs not hanging tough but having more tools to actually kill should it get an upper-hand for a second. I'd agree with you if we were talking about the honey badger, but the wolverine does kill stuff. They have killed big ungulates and are on record easily killing coyotes. It has big time durability and stamina and then also some killing, that's a rough combo. Makes for a good fighter. Honey badger is bullcrap, all hype, but wolverines I think are legit. Yeah true. How do you think a wolverine would match up against a 50lb eastern coyote?
|
|
|
Post by Johnson on Nov 30, 2022 4:21:24 GMT
Wolverine wins.
Shitbull sucks.
Would get owned by a Bobcat.
Shitbulls are only good at killing small children when they are by themselves.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2022 4:53:10 GMT
Wolverine wins. Shitbull sucks. Would get owned by a Bobcat. Shitbulls are only good at killing small children when they are by themselves. Wolverine's dies at ~15 second mark. Prove the pitbull (s) fought back.
|
|
|
Post by s on Sept 27, 2023 18:30:55 GMT
Wolverine wins. Shitbull sucks. Would get owned by a Bobcat. Shitbulls are only good at killing small children when they are by themselves. I heavily disagree with Pitbull losing to a Bobcat, but thank you for countersignalling Pitbulls here. Otherwise no one would. Here is a like
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Sept 27, 2023 18:43:58 GMT
Man guest johnson was such an asshole.
|
|
|
Post by Bolushi on Sept 27, 2023 19:15:54 GMT
Speaking of which, where has the real Johnson been? Maybe we need to make a thread to wake him up.
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Sept 27, 2023 19:18:00 GMT
He's around, he was just shitting on shitbulls like 40 minutes ago.
He posted a video of someone killing pitbulls, while fully erect (I assume).
|
|
|
Post by s on Sept 27, 2023 19:27:08 GMT
He's around, he was just shitting on shitbulls like 40 minutes ago. He posted a video of someone killing pitbulls, while fully erect (I assume). Speaking about Human Vs Pitbull fights, they depend a lot on the Human In the videos of Humans Vs Pitbulls. Some people get pulled to the ground and ripped apart, some people just grab the dog and ragdoll it like its nothing. Fully dependent on the age, gender and fitness of the person. I think a fit adult male will beat a pitbull almost every time if he really wants to.
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Sept 27, 2023 19:32:16 GMT
He's around, he was just shitting on shitbulls like 40 minutes ago. He posted a video of someone killing pitbulls, while fully erect (I assume). Speaking about Human Vs Pitbull fights, they depend a lot on the Human In the videos of Humans Vs Pitbulls. Some people get pulled to the ground and ripped apart, some people just grab the dog and ragdoll it like its nothing. Fully dependent on the age, gender and fitness of the person. I think a fit adult male will beat a pitbull almost every time if he really wants to. I agree. Doesn't even have to be fit. It just depends if he can stay composed and has experience handling dogs. They are unfortunately easy for humans to beat. Humans are a "bogey opponent" for dogs, but luckily many people don't stay composed, get scared and lose.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2023 21:36:38 GMT
Funny how pitbulls can clown on 3000 lb bulls and then get their skulls smashed in by some old dude that works at the local library. Just shows that humans can actually counter some pretty strong animals.
|
|