Post by ophio on May 30, 2023 22:17:29 GMT
May 29, 2023 19:10:00 GMT @ling said:
May 9, 2023 1:01:54 GMT ophio said:
I agree I said " A wild anaconda half the size would already be huge" which would be 110 kg and "would be huge" doesn't even imply thats the absolute maximum although Id say its very close. Again if the largest anaconda out of nearly 1000 couldn't even surpass 100 kg, it is ridiculous to assume a healthy wild anaconda even has the ability to approach the number you initially gave me which was 220 kg. 100 kg+ anacondas are already have a less than 1 in 1000 chance of occurring and anything much larger would be impossible if you understood how standard deviations work and frankly this math doesn't change unless you can produce studies that empty stomach 100 kg + anacondas make up a significant proportions of sexually mature female anacondas
(first one is the largest verified 'conda, other 2 are unweighed individuals)
Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk
Also Photoshop and camera angles make snakes look bigger than they are. Not uncommon