ophio
Ruminant
Posts: 230
|
Post by ophio on May 7, 2023 18:35:54 GMT
What so you're entitling that you'd favour a 20kg snake over a 220kg snake? Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk obviously at parity. I mean there's no credible accounts of a 220kg anaconda in the wild. There are captive anacondas this big but they would be grossly obese. A wild anaconda half the size would already be huge. On that note I'd favor a fit 20 kg snake over a sluggish obese 220 kg one |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2023 18:38:34 GMT
What so you're entitling that you'd favour a 20kg snake over a 220kg snake? Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk obviously at parity. I mean there's no credible accounts of a 220kg anaconda in the wild. There are captive anacondas this big but they would be grossly obese. A wild anaconda half the size would already be huge. On that note I'd favor a fit 20 kg snake over a sluggish obese 220 kg one Lol, the largest verified wild anaconda was like 95kg or so. They get far larger than this. I'll send you an image of this snake in particular. It clearly isn't as big as some other one's. Brazil's known for being poor at recording and studying wild animals. Even ask metasuchus, the guy that lives in Brazil. Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2023 18:42:25 GMT
obviously at parity. I mean there's no credible accounts of a 220kg anaconda in the wild. There are captive anacondas this big but they would be grossly obese. A wild anaconda half the size would already be huge. On that note I'd favor a fit 20 kg snake over a sluggish obese 220 kg one Lol, the largest verified wild anaconda was like 95kg or so. They get far larger than this. I'll send you an image of this snake in particular. It clearly isn't as big as some other one's. Brazil's known for being poor at recording and studying wild animals. Even ask metasuchus, the guy that lives in Brazil. Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk It even states it on the Wikipedia page, and P.S. there was a Green anaconda shot and killed in 1953 that was 163kg.  Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk |
|
ophio
Ruminant
Posts: 230
|
Post by ophio on May 7, 2023 18:46:57 GMT
Lol, the largest verified wild anaconda was like 95kg or so. They get far larger than this. I'll send you an image of this snake in particular. It clearly isn't as big as some other one's. Brazil's known for being poor at recording and studying wild animals. Even ask metasuchus, the guy that lives in Brazil. Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk It even states it on the Wikipedia page, and P.S. there was a Green anaconda shot and killed in 1953 that was 163kg. Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk You said the largest verified anaconda is 95 kg and i said a 100ish kg anaconda is already huge. I think we are saying the same thing |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2023 18:48:23 GMT
It even states it on the Wikipedia page, and P.S. there was a Green anaconda shot and killed in 1953 that was 163kg. Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk You said the largest verified anaconda is 95 kg and i said a 100ish kg anaconda is already huge. I think we are saying the same thing Emphasis on "verified" Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk + it's Brazil |
|
ophio
Ruminant
Posts: 230
|
Post by ophio on May 7, 2023 18:51:23 GMT
You said the largest verified anaconda is 95 kg and i said a 100ish kg anaconda is already huge. I think we are saying the same thing Emphasis on "verified" Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk + it's Brazil Yea i call bull on the unverified weights and the 100 year old account. It probably was a pregnant female with eggs or it still had food it hadn't digested yet. |
|
|
|
Post by Bolushi on May 8, 2023 13:49:14 GMT
A 150lb anaconda with an 100lb deer inside of it does not make the snake 250lbs. Just throwing that out there.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2023 14:51:32 GMT
A 150lb anaconda with an 100lb deer inside of it does not make the snake 250lbs. Just throwing that out there. No shit. Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2023 14:52:52 GMT
Emphasis on "verified" Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk + it's Brazil Yea i call bull on the unverified weights and the 100 year old account. It probably was a pregnant female with eggs or it still had food it hadn't digested yet. Doubt it. Average female Anacondas can commonly weigh between 50-80kg. The fact that the maximum """"recorded""""" weight is only 97kg is crazy and obviously not the largest individual. Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk |
|
ophio
Ruminant
Posts: 230
|
Post by ophio on May 8, 2023 19:30:08 GMT
Yea i call bull on the unverified weights and the 100 year old account. It probably was a pregnant female with eggs or it still had food it hadn't digested yet. Doubt it. Average female Anacondas can commonly weigh between 50-80kg. The fact that the maximum """"recorded""""" weight is only 97kg is crazy and obviously not the largest individual. Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk Given the study of 780 anacondas conducted here. a maximum of 97 kg is not "crazy" at all as it is one standard deviation above your "upper limit" so it is very reasonable that anacondas will top out at around 100 kg. web.archive.org/web/20160303202240/http://www.anacondas.org/diss/disser.pdf# |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2023 20:06:30 GMT
Doubt it. Average female Anacondas can commonly weigh between 50-80kg. The fact that the maximum """"recorded""""" weight is only 97kg is crazy and obviously not the largest individual. Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk Given the study of 780 anacondas conducted here. a maximum of 97 kg is not "crazy" at all as it is one standard deviation above your "upper limit" so it is very reasonable that anacondas will top out at around 100 kg. web.archive.org/web/20160303202240/http://www.anacondas.org/diss/disser.pdf#No it isn't lol. It's a well known fact that anacondas exceed 100kg. It isn't rocket science. Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk |
|
ophio
Ruminant
Posts: 230
|
Post by ophio on May 8, 2023 20:14:07 GMT
No it isn't lol. It's a well known fact that anacondas exceed 100kg. It isn't rocket science. Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk And if you ask some people its a well known fact that ufos and bigfoot exist. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2023 21:09:12 GMT
No it isn't lol. It's a well known fact that anacondas exceed 100kg. It isn't rocket science. Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk And if you ask some people its a well known fact that ufos and bigfoot exist. There are 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets. UFOs exist. 100kg+ anacondas aren't fiction. Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk |
|
ophio
Ruminant
Posts: 230
|
Post by ophio on May 9, 2023 1:01:54 GMT
And if you ask some people its a well known fact that ufos and bigfoot exist. There are 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets. UFOs exist. 100kg+ anacondas aren't fiction. Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk I agree I said " A wild anaconda half the size would already be huge" which would be 110 kg and "would be huge" doesn't even imply thats the absolute maximum although Id say its very close. Again if the largest anaconda out of nearly 1000 couldn't even surpass 100 kg, it is ridiculous to assume a healthy wild anaconda even has the ability to approach the number you initially gave me which was 220 kg. 100 kg+ anacondas are already have a less than 1 in 1000 chance of occurring and anything much larger would be impossible if you understood how standard deviations work and frankly this math doesn't change unless you can produce studies that empty stomach 100 kg + anacondas make up a significant proportions of sexually mature female anacondas |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2023 19:10:00 GMT
There are 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets. UFOs exist. 100kg+ anacondas aren't fiction. Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk I agree I said " A wild anaconda half the size would already be huge" which would be 110 kg and "would be huge" doesn't even imply thats the absolute maximum although Id say its very close. Again if the largest anaconda out of nearly 1000 couldn't even surpass 100 kg, it is ridiculous to assume a healthy wild anaconda even has the ability to approach the number you initially gave me which was 220 kg. 100 kg+ anacondas are already have a less than 1 in 1000 chance of occurring and anything much larger would be impossible if you understood how standard deviations work and frankly this math doesn't change unless you can produce studies that empty stomach 100 kg + anacondas make up a significant proportions of sexually mature female anacondas Have you seen the largest verified anaconda? It's tiny (not really but you know what I mean). Just compare to some other unverified giant anacondas. (first one is the largest verified 'conda, other 2 are unweighed individuals)    Sent from my SM-A105FN using Tapatalk |
|
